The Assignment
A major consumer products
company asked us to evaluate its inbound shipment program with the
goal of finding better ways to manage these shipments. Questions
were: How much are we actually paying for inbound freight? Can we
save money by controlling these shipments? How can we increase the
visibility of our inbound materials?
Our
Strategy
Business Logistics services
conducted an initial evaluation finding that the client did not
actively manage inbound shipments, and that vendors made all transportation
arrangements without consulting the client beforehand. Freight terms
of sale on these shipments varied from prepaid on orders with delivered
pricing to prepay-and-add. A lesser number of shipments moved on
a "freight collect" basis, and vendors routed these shipments
as well.
Our first task was to
identify the client's vendors in terms of location, products and
materials shipped, terms of sale, and spend ranking, grouping vendors
into categories having common denominators such as freight terms
and geographic location.
The next step involved
determining the freight cost
component associated with each vendor's shipments. This was a two-stage
process whereby we calculated the applicable freight transportation
cost for a sampling of actual orders and compared those numbers
to the difference between each vendor's F.O.B. origin pricing and
the delivered (or prepay-and-add) pricing to our client. By doing
so, we were able to assess whether or not savings could be achieved
by converting shipments from current freight terms to freight collect
terms. We also identified areas where the client's private truck
fleet could economically pick up shipments from vendors on an F.O.B.
origin basis, saving the expense of delivery to the client's facilities.
Results
Achieved
We determined that it
was to our client's advantage to convert most inbound shipments
to F.O.B. origin, freight collect. The resulting savings exceeded
28% of freight charges, producing substantial new profits for the
company.
|